Measuring competing explanations of human resource management practices through the Cranet survey: Cultural versus institutional explanations

Michael Brookes, Richard Croucher, Mark Fenton-O'Creevy, Paul Gooderham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper assesses the relative and joint impact of cultural and institutional factors on firms' use of "calculative" human resource management practices to determine their separate analytic power. To what extent do institutions and culture structure managerial choice? Previous research has been constrained by not having measures for both cultural and institutional distance. Employing data from 14 European countries taken from the Cranet survey, our findings indicate that institutional, and more specifically, labour relations factors, have more explanatory power than cultural factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-79
Number of pages12
JournalHuman Resource Management Review
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cultural explanations
  • HRM practices
  • Institutional explanations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring competing explanations of human resource management practices through the Cranet survey: Cultural versus institutional explanations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this