Negotiating mothering against the odds: Gastrostomy tube feeding, stigma, governmentality and disabled children

Gillian Craig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using the findings of a small-scale qualitative investigation based on in-depth interviews with mothers attending a tertiary paediatric referral centre in London, this paper explores professional and parental discourses in relation to gastrostomy tube feeding and disabled children. Detailed accounts are given of women's struggles to negotiate their identities, and those of their children, within dominant discourses of mothering and child-centredness. Constructions of feeding practices as coercive conflict with normative expectations of ‘good mothering’ and the ‘idealised autonomous’ child. Although notions of ‘stigmatised identities’ featured in women's accounts of feeding children, both orally and by tube, stigma fails to explain why mothers are rendered culpable within expert discourses. Prevailing theories of stigma and coping are interrogated and judged to be more descriptive than explanatory. Felt stigma is posited as an aspect of governmentality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1115-1125
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Volume62
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Negotiating mothering against the odds: Gastrostomy tube feeding, stigma, governmentality and disabled children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this