Persuading developers to buy into software process improvement: a local opinion and empirical evidence

A. Rainer, T. Hall, N. Baddoo

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

39 Citations (Scopus)
52 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In order to investigate practitioners’ opinions of software process and software process improvement, we have collected a large volume of qualitative evidence from 13 companies. At the same time, other researchers have reported investigations of practitioners, and we are interested in how their reports may relate to our evidence. Thus, other research publications can also be treated as a form of qualitative data. In this paper, we review advice on a method, content analysis, that is used to analyse qualitative data. We use content analysis to describe and analyse discussions on software process and software process improvement. We report preliminary findings from an analysis of both the focus group evidence and four publications.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProcs 2003 Int Symp on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE)
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Pages326-335
ISBN (Print)0-7695-2002-2
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Persuading developers to buy into software process improvement: a local opinion and empirical evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this