Philosophy in practice? Doctoral struggles with ontology and subjectivity in qualitative interviewing

Chris McLachlan, Reece Garcia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article presents an auto-ethnographic, narrative account of the struggles we – as doctoral students workingin a business school – experienced navigating the link between research philosophy and methodology. We focus on a popular philosophical perspective among doctoral students: critical realism. In particular, we use an illustrative example of how we sought to apply this seemingly abstract philosophical perspective in practice in our qualitative interviews, using what we term the ontological whats and epistemological hows. Our initial critical realist approach proved inadequate, however, prompting us to understand qualitative interviewing in moresocial constructionist terms. Given this, we suggest that doctoral students (and researchers) are reflexive and provocative in their use of applying research philosophy to methodology. In sharing our experiences, we offera pedagogical contribution for fellow doctoral students and qualitative researchers alike.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-210
Number of pages16
JournalManagement Learning
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Mar 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Philosophy in practice? Doctoral struggles with ontology and subjectivity in qualitative interviewing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this