Poverty of stimulus and absence of cause : some questions for Felin and Foss

Geoffrey Hodgson, T. Knudsen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)
    55 Downloads (Pure)


    We examine an aspect of the argument of Teppo Felin and Nicolai Foss ('The Endogenous Origins of Experience, Routines, and Organizational Capabilities: The Poverty of Stimulus'; 2011) where they reject the claim of Geoffrey Hodgson and Thorbjorn Knudsen ('Darwinism, Causality and the Social Sciences'; 2004) that habits depend crucially on stimuli from the social environment. We argue that while rightly stressing human agency they also create a false dichotomy between agential and environmental factors in the explanation. Felin and Foss create further confusion by hinting - without adequate clarification - at an untenable notion of human agency as an uncaused cause. We raise several questions of clarification for these authors.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)295-298
    Number of pages4
    JournalJournal of Institutional Economics
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2011


    • routines
    • habits
    • causality
    • evolution
    • uncaused cause


    Dive into the research topics of 'Poverty of stimulus and absence of cause : some questions for Felin and Foss'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this