TY - JOUR
T1 - Practitioners as researchers–experiences of four people working in hybrid roles in two local authorities and a university
AU - Woolham, John
AU - Connell, Toby
AU - Metcalf, Chris
AU - Swinson, Tom
AU - Tooke, Sophie
AU - Buswell, Marina
AU - Efstathopoulou, Lida
AU - Lynch, Jennifer
AU - Mioshi, Eneida
AU - O’Brien, Leisha
AU - Warmoth, Krystal
AU - Almack, Kathryn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This paper focuses on experiences of four professionals working in Adult Social Care Departments (ASCDs) and university researchers. Objectives were to explore research capacity building using a Community of Practice (CoP) model, for CoP Associates to promote research in workplace settings and for practitioner/researchers to produce actionable findings. Data were obtained from semi-structured interviews, conducted twice, fully transcribed and analyzed using Framework Analysis. Research training was provided before commencement, and academic supervision throughout. CoP Associates included local authority professionals, and experts by experience. Training was not phased to support hybrid workers with sequential stages of the research process, who also felt more guidance was needed with ethical review. A ‘disconnect’ remained between ASCD staff and research, evidenced by a lack of interest among front-line staff, of support for fieldwork, and non-attendance of professionals at CoP meetings. Spontaneously created meetings between hybrid workers did resemble a CoP model. Combining research and practice roles was challenging. Suggestions are offered for the optimization of hybrid roles, including the need for universities to maintain links with ASCDs and offer short, focused training to help staff interested in research.
AB - This paper focuses on experiences of four professionals working in Adult Social Care Departments (ASCDs) and university researchers. Objectives were to explore research capacity building using a Community of Practice (CoP) model, for CoP Associates to promote research in workplace settings and for practitioner/researchers to produce actionable findings. Data were obtained from semi-structured interviews, conducted twice, fully transcribed and analyzed using Framework Analysis. Research training was provided before commencement, and academic supervision throughout. CoP Associates included local authority professionals, and experts by experience. Training was not phased to support hybrid workers with sequential stages of the research process, who also felt more guidance was needed with ethical review. A ‘disconnect’ remained between ASCD staff and research, evidenced by a lack of interest among front-line staff, of support for fieldwork, and non-attendance of professionals at CoP meetings. Spontaneously created meetings between hybrid workers did resemble a CoP model. Combining research and practice roles was challenging. Suggestions are offered for the optimization of hybrid roles, including the need for universities to maintain links with ASCDs and offer short, focused training to help staff interested in research.
KW - hybrid research/practitioner roles
KW - local authorities
KW - Research Cultures
KW - Research evidence
KW - Social Work Research
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010870942
U2 - 10.1080/02615479.2025.2531860
DO - 10.1080/02615479.2025.2531860
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105010870942
SN - 0261-5479
JO - Social Work Education
JF - Social Work Education
ER -