TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity of fiber reinforced concrete incorporating nano silica using heuristic regression methods
AU - Ashrafian, Ali
AU - Taheri Amiri, Mohammad Javad
AU - Rezaie-Balf, Mohammad
AU - Ozbakkaloglu, Togay
AU - Lotfi-Omran, Omid
PY - 2018/11/30
Y1 - 2018/11/30
N2 - In this study, five different Artificial Intelligence (AI) models, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), M5P Model Tree (M5P-MT), Least Square Support Vector Machines (LS-SVM), Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network (MLP-NN) and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) have been developed to predict the Compressive Strength (CS) and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) of Fiber Reinforced Concrete (FRC) incorporating nano silica. Experimental results from 175 and 132 concrete samples with different mixture proportions were collated, respectively, to develop the models for CS and UPV. Standard statistical performance evaluation measures such as the Correlation Coefficient (CC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage of Error (MAPE), Performance Index (PI), Average Absolute Error (AAE), Standard Deviation (SD) and mean (M) were used to evaluate proposed models in training and testing stages. The MARS model using normalized input data performed better compared to LS-SVM, M5P-MT, MLP-NN and MLR in the prediction of both UPV and CS. The robustness of the developed AI predictive models was verified through external validations and the results indicate that proposed models are robust and they provide accurate predictions of CS and UPV.
AB - In this study, five different Artificial Intelligence (AI) models, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), M5P Model Tree (M5P-MT), Least Square Support Vector Machines (LS-SVM), Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network (MLP-NN) and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) have been developed to predict the Compressive Strength (CS) and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) of Fiber Reinforced Concrete (FRC) incorporating nano silica. Experimental results from 175 and 132 concrete samples with different mixture proportions were collated, respectively, to develop the models for CS and UPV. Standard statistical performance evaluation measures such as the Correlation Coefficient (CC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage of Error (MAPE), Performance Index (PI), Average Absolute Error (AAE), Standard Deviation (SD) and mean (M) were used to evaluate proposed models in training and testing stages. The MARS model using normalized input data performed better compared to LS-SVM, M5P-MT, MLP-NN and MLR in the prediction of both UPV and CS. The robustness of the developed AI predictive models was verified through external validations and the results indicate that proposed models are robust and they provide accurate predictions of CS and UPV.
KW - Artificial intelligence models
KW - Compressive strength
KW - Fiber reinforced concrete
KW - Nano silica
KW - Ultrasonic pulse velocity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053816637&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.047
DO - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.047
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85053816637
SN - 0950-0618
VL - 190
SP - 479
EP - 494
JO - Construction and Building Materials
JF - Construction and Building Materials
ER -