TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric properties of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) across cross-cultural subgroups, genders, and sexual orientations: Findings from the International Sex Survey (ISS)
AU - Sungkyunkwan University's Research Team
AU - Horváth, Zsolt
AU - Nagy, Léna
AU - Koós, Mónika
AU - Kraus, Shane W
AU - Demetrovics, Zsolt
AU - Potenza, Marc N
AU - Ballester-Arnal, Rafael
AU - Batthyány, Dominik
AU - Bergeron, Sophie
AU - Billieux, Joël
AU - Briken, Peer
AU - Burkauskas, Julius
AU - Cárdenas-López, Georgina
AU - Carvalho, Joana
AU - Castro-Calvo, Jesús
AU - Chen, Lijun
AU - Ciocca, Giacomo
AU - Corazza, Ornella
AU - Csako, Rita
AU - Fernandez, David P
AU - Fujiwara, Hironobu
AU - Fernandez, Elaine F
AU - Fuss, Johannes
AU - Gabrhelík, Roman
AU - Gewirtz-Meydan, Ateret
AU - Gjoneska, Biljana
AU - Gola, Mateusz
AU - Grubbs, Joshua B
AU - Hashim, Hashim T
AU - Islam, Md Saiful
AU - Ismail, Mustafa
AU - Jiménez-Martínez, Martha C
AU - Jurin, Tanja
AU - Kalina, Ondrej
AU - Klein, Verena
AU - Költő, András
AU - Lee, Sang-Kyu
AU - Lewczuk, Karol
AU - Lin, Chung-Ying
AU - Lochner, Christine
AU - López-Alvarado, Silvia
AU - Lukavská, Kateřina
AU - Mayta-Tristán, Percy
AU - Miller, Dan J
AU - Orosová, Oľga
AU - Orosz, Gábor
AU - Ponce, Fernando P
AU - Quintana, Gonzalo R
AU - Quintero Garzola, Gabriel C
AU - Ramos-Diaz, Jano
N1 - © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).
PY - 2023/11/30
Y1 - 2023/11/30
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Despite being a widely used screening questionnaire, there is no consensus on the most appropriate measurement model for the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Furthermore, there have been limited studies on its measurement invariance across cross-cultural subgroups, genders, and sexual orientations.AIMS: The present study aimed to examine the fit of different measurement models for the AUDIT and its measurement invariance across a wide range of subgroups by country, language, gender, and sexual orientation.METHODS: Responses concerning past-year alcohol use from the participants of the cross-sectional International Sex Survey were considered (N = 62,943; M
age: 32.73; SD = 12.59). Confirmatory factor analysis, as well as measurement invariance tests were performed for 21 countries, 14 languages, three genders, and four sexual-orientation subgroups that met the minimum sample size requirement for inclusion in these analyses.
RESULTS: A two-factor model with factors describing 'alcohol use' (items 1-3) and 'alcohol problems' (items 4-10) showed the best model fit across countries, languages, genders, and sexual orientations. For the former two, scalar and latent mean levels of invariance were reached considering different criteria. For gender and sexual orientation, a latent mean level of invariance was reached.CONCLUSIONS: In line with the two-factor model, the calculation of separate alcohol-use and alcohol-problem scores is recommended when using the AUDIT. The high levels of measurement invariance achieved for the AUDIT support its use in cross-cultural research, capable also of meaningful comparisons among genders and sexual orientations.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Despite being a widely used screening questionnaire, there is no consensus on the most appropriate measurement model for the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Furthermore, there have been limited studies on its measurement invariance across cross-cultural subgroups, genders, and sexual orientations.AIMS: The present study aimed to examine the fit of different measurement models for the AUDIT and its measurement invariance across a wide range of subgroups by country, language, gender, and sexual orientation.METHODS: Responses concerning past-year alcohol use from the participants of the cross-sectional International Sex Survey were considered (N = 62,943; M
age: 32.73; SD = 12.59). Confirmatory factor analysis, as well as measurement invariance tests were performed for 21 countries, 14 languages, three genders, and four sexual-orientation subgroups that met the minimum sample size requirement for inclusion in these analyses.
RESULTS: A two-factor model with factors describing 'alcohol use' (items 1-3) and 'alcohol problems' (items 4-10) showed the best model fit across countries, languages, genders, and sexual orientations. For the former two, scalar and latent mean levels of invariance were reached considering different criteria. For gender and sexual orientation, a latent mean level of invariance was reached.CONCLUSIONS: In line with the two-factor model, the calculation of separate alcohol-use and alcohol-problem scores is recommended when using the AUDIT. The high levels of measurement invariance achieved for the AUDIT support its use in cross-cultural research, capable also of meaningful comparisons among genders and sexual orientations.
KW - Addictive behaviors
KW - Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
KW - Cross-cultural comparison
KW - Gender
KW - LGBTQ
KW - Measurement invariance
KW - Sexual orientation
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Sexual Behavior
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Factor Analysis, Statistical
KW - Cross-Cultural Comparison
KW - Alcoholism/diagnosis
KW - Female
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173926884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152427
DO - 10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152427
M3 - Article
C2 - 37782987
SN - 0010-440X
VL - 127
SP - 1
EP - 23
JO - Comprehensive Psychiatry
JF - Comprehensive Psychiatry
M1 - 152427
ER -