Questing for happiness: augmenting Aristotle with Davidson

D. Hutto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Drawing heavily on Aristotle, Tabensky attempts to establish ‘an ethic that flows from the very structure of our being’, but he also calls on Davidson’s arguments about the essentially social character of rationality to shore up Aristotle’s claim that we are essentially social beings. This much of his project, I argue is successful. However Tabensky takes this a step further and proposes a pluralist ethic on the grounds that a ‘fully’ or ‘properly’ instantiated account of the ‘ideal’ conditions for rationality requires encountering innumerable other points of view. Firstly, while confronting alternatives is essential to truth-seeking it hardly follows that an unconstrained pluralism represents an ideal condition for this kind of inquiry, since such an approach risks falling into mere clash of perspectives on practical grounds. Secondly, it is unclear how confronting more and more perspectives is supposed to help in enabling us to lead our lives well. In conclusion, picking up on this theme and looking again at Aristotle, I give reasons for questioning that the kind of rational choice involved in leading the good life, for reasons in part highlighted by Tabensky, benefits from analogy with the modes of conceptual rational inquiry in other domains in any case.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-393
JournalSouth African Journal of Philosophy
Volume23
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Questing for happiness: augmenting Aristotle with Davidson'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this