Radiological audit of interval breast cancers: Estimation of tumour growth rates

Emma G MacInnes, Stephen W Duffy, Julie A Simpson, Matthew G Wallis, Anne E Turnbull, Louise S Wilkinson, Keshthra Satchithananda, Rumana Rahim, David Dodwell, Brian V Hogan, Oleg Blyuss, Nisha Sharma

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)
    129 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    INTRODUCTION: This multicentre, retrospective study aimed to establish correlation between estimated tumour volume doubling times (TVDT) from a series of interval breast cancers with their clinicopathological features. The potential impact of delayed diagnosis on prognosis was also explored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interval cancers, where screening mammograms demonstrated changes that were retrospectively classified as either uncertain or suspicious, were reviewed from five screening units within the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP). Data collected included the time interval between screening mammogram and cancer diagnosis, the size of the initial mammographic abnormality and of the subsequent cancer, demographics, mammographic density and tumour biology. We estimated volume doubling times and the estimated change in size and node status, which would have followed if these cancers had been detected at the previous screen.RESULTS: 306 interval cancers meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Average time from screening to diagnosis was 644 days (SD 276 days). 19% were diagnosed in the first twelve months, 42% in the subsequent twelve months and 39% thereafter. Overall average estimated TVDT was 167 days (95% CI 151-186). Significant differences were noted with age (p = 0.01), grade (p < 0.001) and ER status (p < 0.001) with women under 60, grade 3 cancers and ER negative cancers having shorter TVDTs. HER2 positive tumours had shorter doubling times than HER2 negative, but this difference was not statistically significant. It was estimated that diagnosing these cancers at the previous screen would have increased ten-year survival from 82% to 86%.CONCLUSION: High grade, ER negativity and younger age were associated with shorter durations of TVDT. The role of HER2 status on interval cancer growth rate requires further assessment. It is likely that the delayed diagnosis of interval cancers confers a 4% reduction in ten-year survival.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)114-119
    Number of pages6
    JournalBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
    Volume51
    Early online date1 Apr 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Radiological audit of interval breast cancers: Estimation of tumour growth rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this