Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Randomized Trial—PrEscription of intraDialytic exercise to improve quAlity of Life in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis

  • Sharlene A. Greenwood
  • , Pelagia Koufaki
  • , Jamie H. Macdonald
  • , Sunil Bhandari
  • , James O. Burton
  • , Indranil Dasgupta
  • , Kenneth Farrington
  • , Ian Ford
  • , Philip A. Kalra
  • , Sharon Kean
  • , Mick Kumwenda
  • , Iain C. Macdougall
  • , Claudia Martina Messow
  • , Sandip Mitra
  • , Chante Reid
  • , Alice C. Smith
  • , Maarten W. Taal
  • , Peter C. Thomson
  • , David C. Wheeler
  • , Claire White
  • Magdi Yaqoob, Thomas H. Mercer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Whether clinically implementable exercise interventions in people receiving hemodialysis (HD) therapy improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains unknown. The PrEscription of intraDialytic exercise to improve quAlity of Life (PEDAL) study evaluated the clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of a 6-month intradialytic exercise program. Methods: In a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial, people receiving HD were randomly assigned to (i) intradialytic exercise training (exercise intervention group [EX]) and (ii) usual care (control group [CON]). Primary outcome was change in Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short-Form Physical Component Summary (KDQOL-SF 1.3 PCS) from baseline to 6 months. Cost-effectiveness was determined using health economic analysis; physiological impairment was evaluated by peak oxygen uptake; and harms were recorded. Results: We randomized 379 participants; 335 and 243 patients (EX n = 127; CON n = 116) completed baseline and 6-month assessments, respectively. Mean difference in change PCS from baseline to 6 months between EX and CON was 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.1 to 4.8) arbitrary units (P = 0.055); no improvements were observed in peak oxygen uptake or secondary outcome measures. Participants in the intervention group had poor compliance (47%) and poor adherence (18%) to the exercise prescription. Cost of delivering intervention ranged from US$598 to US$1092 per participant per year. The number of participants with harms was similar between EX (n = 69) and CON (n = 56). A primary limitation was the lack of an attention CON. Many patients also withdrew from the study or were too unwell to complete all physiological outcome assessments. Conclusions: A 6-month intradialytic aerobic exercise program was not clinically beneficial in improving HRQoL as delivered to this cohort of deconditioned patients on HD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2159-2170
Number of pages12
JournalKidney International Reports
Volume6
Issue number8
Early online date29 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Aug 2021

Keywords

  • chronic kidney disease
  • physical activity
  • physical function
  • rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized Trial—PrEscription of intraDialytic exercise to improve quAlity of Life in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this