Abstract
AI systems are, and will continue to be, designed for “bounded moral contexts” (Wallach and Wallach 2020), which risks creating a persistent gap between value alignment and the regulatory ambition of human-centric, ethical AI. This gap challenges the adequacy of prevailing ethics and governance approaches, as exemplified by the EU AI Act (2024), which remain largely anchored in applied ethics and market-driven rationales, offering little response to deeper questions of moral integration. By contrast, a metaethical perspective interrogates the ontological and epistemic foundations of moral reasoning and value formalisation in AI. Upholding this perspective, this chapter proposes a multidimensional framework that integrates empathic metaethics, emancipatory approach, democratic participation and the dismantling of structural and unjust dominant views. Taken together, these dimensions would support not only a richer, pluralistic and context-sensitive approach for AI design but also development of a holistic regulatory metaethics. The chapter concludes such a deeper and structural engagement is indispensable to advancing genuinely human-centric AI, ensuring systems are morally robust, socially responsive and conducive to human flourishing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Palgrave Handbook on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence |
| Editors | Steven Gouveia |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Chapter | 1 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783032151124 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783032151117 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 1 May 2026 |
Keywords
- Artificial intelligence
- Ethics
- Trust
- Wisdom
- Epistemic values
- Knowledge
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Re-aligning value alignment: A metaethical perspective on AI ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver