Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Re-aligning value alignment: A metaethical perspective on AI ethics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

AI systems are, and will continue to be, designed for “bounded moral contexts” (Wallach and Wallach 2020), which risks creating a persistent gap between value alignment and the regulatory ambition of human-centric, ethical AI. This gap challenges the adequacy of prevailing ethics and governance approaches, as exemplified by the EU AI Act (2024), which remain largely anchored in applied ethics and market-driven rationales, offering little response to deeper questions of moral integration. By contrast, a metaethical perspective interrogates the ontological and epistemic foundations of moral reasoning and value formalisation in AI. Upholding this perspective, this chapter proposes a multidimensional framework that integrates empathic metaethics, emancipatory approach, democratic participation and the dismantling of structural and unjust dominant views. Taken together, these dimensions would support not only a richer, pluralistic and context-sensitive approach for AI design but also development of a holistic regulatory metaethics. The chapter concludes such a deeper and structural engagement is indispensable to advancing genuinely human-centric AI, ensuring systems are morally robust, socially responsive and conducive to human flourishing.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Palgrave Handbook on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
EditorsSteven Gouveia
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter1
Pages1-16
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9783032151124
ISBN (Print)9783032151117
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 May 2026

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Ethics
  • Trust
  • Wisdom
  • Epistemic values
  • Knowledge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Re-aligning value alignment: A metaethical perspective on AI ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this