Reframing Agency in Complexity-sensitive Peacebuilding

Elisa Randazzo, Ignasi Torrent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines how the growing complexity of peacebuilding settings is transforming the classic notion of purposeful agency into a non-purposeful, adaptive form of being in such contexts. Through an analysis of critical peacebuilding literature and a reflection on the UN’s peacebuilding practices in the field, the article first argues that complexity has been gradually replacing linear, top-down strategies with approaches seeking to draw attention to interdependencies, relationality and uncertainty. The article then suggests that engaging with complexity has critical implications for the traditional understanding of purposeful agency in the peacebuilding milieu that go beyond those of the governmentality critique, which conceptualizes the complexity turn as a strategy for extending control over post-conflict societies. Complexity is eventually conceived of in the article as a performative contextual quality that stems from the non-linear, co-emergent and unpredictable entanglement of interactions between actors in peacebuilding processes. This state of entanglement hinders the autonomous, purposeful agential condition of these actors in war-torn scenarios – in this article, peacebuilding implementers specifically – in which agency seems more and more restricted to its adaptive nature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-20
Number of pages18
JournalSecurity Dialogue
Volume52
Issue number1
Early online date16 Apr 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2021

Keywords

  • Agency
  • United Nations
  • complexity
  • governmentality
  • peacebuilding
  • relationality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reframing Agency in Complexity-sensitive Peacebuilding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this