Remote data collection during COVID-19 restrictions: an example from a refugee and asylum-seeker participant group in the UK

Lauren Walker, Della Bailey, Rachel Churchill, Emily Peckham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article describes how one trial site of the Refugee Emergency: Defining and Implementing Novel Evidence-based psychosocial interventions (RE-DEFINE) study, designed to evaluate a Self Help+ intervention with Arabic-speaking refugees and asylum seekers currently living in the UK and experiencing stress, was adapted to accommodate social distancing rules and working from home during the COVID-19 restrictions. Digital divide, risk and safety management, acceptability of remote data collection and practical considerations are described. The adaptions to methods have practical implications for researchers looking for more flexible approaches in response to continuing restrictions resulting from COVID-19, and the authors believe that others could adopt such an approach. The need for a further acceptability study focusing on human and economic costs and benefits of telephone and video as an alternative to face-to-face data collection is indicated. TRIALS REGISTRATION: Refugee Emergency - Defining and Implementing Novel Evidence-based psychosocial interventions RE-DEFINE. (Trials registration numbers NCT03571347 , NCT03587896 ) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030259 (2019).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117
JournalTrials
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Arabs/psychology
  • COVID-19/epidemiology
  • Data Collection/methods
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Pandemics
  • Physical Distancing
  • Quarantine/psychology
  • Refugees/psychology
  • Risk Management
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Telephone
  • Teleworking
  • United Kingdom/epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Remote data collection during COVID-19 restrictions: an example from a refugee and asylum-seeker participant group in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this