Retained EU Law:  A Tale of Two Statutes

Kate Ollerenshaw

Retained EU Law: A Tale of Two Statutes

Kate Ollerenshaw

Hertfordshire Law School

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 received royal assent on the same day. One is generally applicable; the other is specifically related to financial services and markets regulation. Both allow for the revocation, restatement and modification of retained EU law, though their approaches differ. This article will compare the mechanisms in each to argue that a single regime, based on the approach in REULA, would have been preferable.

Original language	English
Pages	264-266
Number of pages	3
Volume	39
No.	4
Specialist publication	Journal of International Banking and Financial Law
Publisher	LexisNexis
Publication status	Published - 12 Apr 2024

Access to Document

Accepted_Manuscript
© 2024 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article first appeared in the April issue of Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law.
Accepted author manuscript, 138 KBLicence: Unspecified

https://plus.lexis.com/uk/document/?pdmfid=1001073&crid=3f0994cc-946b-4d63-9325-b28c76ccbd20&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fanalytical-materials-uk%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A6BRR-0H13-RRVM-D2S0-00000-00&pdcontentcomponentid=280100&pdteaserkey=&pdislpamode=false&pddocumentnumber=1&pdworkfolderlocatorid=NOT_SAVED_IN_WORKFOLDER&ecomp=dt5k&earg=sr0&prid=3130b098-8486-403f-babf-7ca3ce94a930Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

Ollerenshaw, K. (2024). Retained EU Law: A Tale of Two Statutes. Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, 39(4), 264-266. https://plus.lexis.com/uk/document/?pdmfid=1001073&crid=3f0994cc-946b-4d63-9325-b28c76ccbd20&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fanalytical-materials-uk%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A6BRR-0H13-RRVM-D2S0-00000-00&pdcontentcomponentid=280100&pdteaserkey=&pdislpamode=false&pddocumentnumber=1&pdworkfolderlocatorid=NOT_SAVED_IN_WORKFOLDER&ecomp=dt5k&earg=sr0&prid=3130b098-8486-403f-babf-7ca3ce94a930

@misc{83b62ddf85fc4f7d9af0180261f39f6c,

title = "Retained EU Law: A Tale of Two Statutes",

abstract = "The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 received royal assent on the same day. One is generally applicable; the other is specifically related to financial services and markets regulation. Both allow for the revocation, restatement and modification of retained EU law, though their approaches differ. This article will compare the mechanisms in each to argue that a single regime, based on the approach in REULA, would have been preferable. ",

author = "Kate Ollerenshaw",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2024 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article first appeared in the April issue of Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law.",

year = "2024",

month = apr,

day = "12",

language = "English",

volume = "39",

pages = "264--266",

journal = "Journal of International Banking and Financial Law",

issn = "0269-2694",

publisher = "LexisNexis",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

Ollerenshaw, K 2024, 'Retained EU Law: A Tale of Two Statutes' Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 264-266. <https://plus.lexis.com/uk/document/?pdmfid=1001073&crid=3f0994cc-946b-4d63-9325-b28c76ccbd20&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fanalytical-materials-uk%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A6BRR-0H13-RRVM-D2S0-00000-00&pdcontentcomponentid=280100&pdteaserkey=&pdislpamode=false&pddocumentnumber=1&pdworkfolderlocatorid=NOT_SAVED_IN_WORKFOLDER&ecomp=dt5k&earg=sr0&prid=3130b098-8486-403f-babf-7ca3ce94a930>

TY - GEN

T1 - Retained EU Law: A Tale of Two Statutes

AU - Ollerenshaw, Kate

N1 - © 2024 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article first appeared in the April issue of Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law.

PY - 2024/4/12

Y1 - 2024/4/12

N2 - The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 received royal assent on the same day. One is generally applicable; the other is specifically related to financial services and markets regulation. Both allow for the revocation, restatement and modification of retained EU law, though their approaches differ. This article will compare the mechanisms in each to argue that a single regime, based on the approach in REULA, would have been preferable.

AB - The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 received royal assent on the same day. One is generally applicable; the other is specifically related to financial services and markets regulation. Both allow for the revocation, restatement and modification of retained EU law, though their approaches differ. This article will compare the mechanisms in each to argue that a single regime, based on the approach in REULA, would have been preferable.

M3 - Article

SN - 0269-2694

VL - 39

SP - 264

EP - 266

JO - Journal of International Banking and Financial Law

JF - Journal of International Banking and Financial Law

PB - LexisNexis

ER -

Retained EU Law: A Tale of Two Statutes

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this