Scientific Citizenship and good governance: implications for biotechnology

Keith Davies, J. Wolf-Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)


In the wake of public distrust regarding biotechnology, it has been suggested that the debate should be moved 'upstream', whereby the public help to set research priorities. Although many scientists see this as an illogical reaction to a loss of faith in science, we argue that the boundaries between science and its technological applications have become blurred and this produces conflicts of interests that have led to this crisis of trust. Furthermore, this distrust is also a crisis in governance that calls for a new open and democratic approach to scientific research. We propose that the concept of Scientific Citizenship, based on good governance, will help to restore public trust and bridge the gap between science and the society that it serves. Integral to this is the suggestion that the governance of science forms part of the training for scientists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-61
Number of pages5
JournalTrends in Biotechnology
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2006


Dive into the research topics of 'Scientific Citizenship and good governance: implications for biotechnology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this