TY - JOUR
T1 - Self-development in support of innovative pedagogies
T2 - peer support using e-mail
AU - Clegg, Sue
AU - McManus, Mike
AU - Smith, Karen
AU - Todd, Malcolm
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Staff involved in pedagogic innovations are often presented with challenges that take them outside their customary spheres of expertise and disciplinary identities. This paper presents an analysis of data collected from staff involved in a ‘bottom up’ pedagogic innovation introducing inquiry‐based learning to a cohort of first year social science students. Data were collected in the form of transcripts of emails shared by staff weekly during the development, research interviews conducted after the module had finished, and a follow up email questionnaire a year later asking them to reflect on the value of the original email exchanges. The email exchanges were descriptive close‐to‐action summaries of events in the classroom and provided a way of creating teaching as community property. The follow‐up interviews revealed states of uncertainty and liminality (in‐betweeness). The paper argues that the characteristics of email, as both informal and intimate and at the same time a public mode of exchange, allowed sharing which supported tutor learning. The paper illustrates the importance of different sorts of talk in community creation and in supporting academic innovation
AB - Staff involved in pedagogic innovations are often presented with challenges that take them outside their customary spheres of expertise and disciplinary identities. This paper presents an analysis of data collected from staff involved in a ‘bottom up’ pedagogic innovation introducing inquiry‐based learning to a cohort of first year social science students. Data were collected in the form of transcripts of emails shared by staff weekly during the development, research interviews conducted after the module had finished, and a follow up email questionnaire a year later asking them to reflect on the value of the original email exchanges. The email exchanges were descriptive close‐to‐action summaries of events in the classroom and provided a way of creating teaching as community property. The follow‐up interviews revealed states of uncertainty and liminality (in‐betweeness). The paper argues that the characteristics of email, as both informal and intimate and at the same time a public mode of exchange, allowed sharing which supported tutor learning. The paper illustrates the importance of different sorts of talk in community creation and in supporting academic innovation
U2 - 10.1080/13601440600924421
DO - 10.1080/13601440600924421
M3 - Article
SN - 1470-1324
VL - 11
SP - 91
EP - 100
JO - International Journal for Academic Development
JF - International Journal for Academic Development
IS - 2
ER -