Abstract
ABSTRACT
Objectives
This study had three aims 1) To investigate the effect of sex and leg dominance on eccentric hip abduction (HABd) strength 2) determine sex differences in magnitude of asymmetry and 3) determine the association of sex and direction of asymmetry.
Design
Cross-sectional study
Setting
University laboratory
Participants
61 athletes (39 males, 22 females) participating in sports requiring change of direction (COD)
Main outcome measures
Eccentric HABd strength was tested in both legs for all participants using an eccentric break test with a Handheld dynamometer (HHD).
Results
This study found no interaction of sex and leg dominance on eccentric HABd strength (absolute: p=0.52, adjusted p=0.10). Significant main effects were found for leg dominance (absolute: p=<0.01, η2=0.22, adjusted: p=0.00, η2=0.16) and sex on absolute (p=<0.01, η2=0.31) but not adjusted eccentric HABd strength (p=0.08, η2=0.05). Females demonstrated statistically significant higher magnitude of asymmetry values (15.3%) compared to males (9.8%) (p=0.01). There was no association between sex and direction of asymmetry (absolute: χ2(1) = .24, p = .62, adjusted: χ2(1) = 1.15, p = .28).
Conclusion
Female athletes are likely to have greater eccentric HABd asymmetry which may predispose them to adverse lower extremity biomechanics and increase injury risk.
Objectives
This study had three aims 1) To investigate the effect of sex and leg dominance on eccentric hip abduction (HABd) strength 2) determine sex differences in magnitude of asymmetry and 3) determine the association of sex and direction of asymmetry.
Design
Cross-sectional study
Setting
University laboratory
Participants
61 athletes (39 males, 22 females) participating in sports requiring change of direction (COD)
Main outcome measures
Eccentric HABd strength was tested in both legs for all participants using an eccentric break test with a Handheld dynamometer (HHD).
Results
This study found no interaction of sex and leg dominance on eccentric HABd strength (absolute: p=0.52, adjusted p=0.10). Significant main effects were found for leg dominance (absolute: p=<0.01, η2=0.22, adjusted: p=0.00, η2=0.16) and sex on absolute (p=<0.01, η2=0.31) but not adjusted eccentric HABd strength (p=0.08, η2=0.05). Females demonstrated statistically significant higher magnitude of asymmetry values (15.3%) compared to males (9.8%) (p=0.01). There was no association between sex and direction of asymmetry (absolute: χ2(1) = .24, p = .62, adjusted: χ2(1) = 1.15, p = .28).
Conclusion
Female athletes are likely to have greater eccentric HABd asymmetry which may predispose them to adverse lower extremity biomechanics and increase injury risk.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-20 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | International Journal of strength and conditioning |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 21 Feb 2025 |
Keywords
- asymmetry
- hip abduction
- strength