Abstract
In marketing, as in other areas of management studies, there is a feeling abroad that lines of communication need to be improved between those who work largely in the academic sphere and the practitioner community. Introduces the papers presented in this special issue, which explore the nature of the “academic-practitioner divide”, investigates the reasons for it and the barriers to communication that exist, and put forward ideas for improving the effectiveness of academic-practitioner collaboration. However, members of the academic community should carefully avoid a headlong and uncritical rush for managerial relevance, since their claim to a unique position in the knowledge production process relies on maintaining objectivity and a certain distance from the day-to-day pressures of marketing management
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 492-500 |
| Journal | Marketing Intelligence and Planning |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2004 |
Keywords
- managerial relevance
- rigour
- validity
- reliability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Should we worry about an "academic-practitioner divide" in marketing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver