Some claims made for critical realism in economics: two case studies

G. Hodgson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Instead of examining critical realism directly, this essay critically examines claims made by two prominent critical realists, namely Andrew Collier and Tony Lawson, on behalf of their philosophy. These are (a) that critical realism supports Marx’s law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, and (b) that critical realism is illustrated by the workplace organisation theory of the relative decline of the British economy. It is argued that the first claim is false and the second is unsubstantiated. Furthermore, propositions that are rejected by Collier and Lawson are shown in fact to be consistent with critical realism. These two case studies raise important questions concerning the claims made for critical realism on behalf of its adherents. Some questions are also posed concerning the character of critical realism as a movement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-73
JournalJournal of Economic Methodology
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Some claims made for critical realism in economics: two case studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this