TY - JOUR
T1 - Sonification of combined action observation and motor imagery
T2 - Effects on corticospinal excitability
AU - Castro, Fabio
AU - Bryjka, Paulina Anna
AU - Di Pino, Giovanni
AU - Vuckovic, Aleksandra
AU - Nowicky, Alexander
AU - Bishop, Daniel
N1 - Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Action observation and motor imagery are valuable strategies for motor learning. Their simultaneous use (AOMI) increases neural activity, with related benefits for motor learning, compared to the two strategies alone. In this study, we explored how sonification influences AOMI. Twenty-five participants completed a practice block based on AOMI, motor imagery and physical execution of the same action. Participants were divided into two groups: An experimental group that practiced with sonification during AOMI (sAOMI), and a control group, which did not receive any extrinsic feedback. Corticospinal excitability at rest and during action observation and AOMI was assessed before and after practice, with and without sonification sound, to test the development of an audiomotor association. The practice block increased corticospinal excitability in all testing conditions, but sonification did not affect this. In addition, we found no differences in action observation and AOMI, irrespective of sonification. These results suggest that, at least for simple tasks, sonification of AOMI does not influence corticospinal excitability; In these conditions, sonification may have acted as a distractor. Future studies should further explore the relationship between task complexity, value of auditory information and action, to establish whether sAOMI is a valuable for motor learning.
AB - Action observation and motor imagery are valuable strategies for motor learning. Their simultaneous use (AOMI) increases neural activity, with related benefits for motor learning, compared to the two strategies alone. In this study, we explored how sonification influences AOMI. Twenty-five participants completed a practice block based on AOMI, motor imagery and physical execution of the same action. Participants were divided into two groups: An experimental group that practiced with sonification during AOMI (sAOMI), and a control group, which did not receive any extrinsic feedback. Corticospinal excitability at rest and during action observation and AOMI was assessed before and after practice, with and without sonification sound, to test the development of an audiomotor association. The practice block increased corticospinal excitability in all testing conditions, but sonification did not affect this. In addition, we found no differences in action observation and AOMI, irrespective of sonification. These results suggest that, at least for simple tasks, sonification of AOMI does not influence corticospinal excitability; In these conditions, sonification may have acted as a distractor. Future studies should further explore the relationship between task complexity, value of auditory information and action, to establish whether sAOMI is a valuable for motor learning.
KW - Neurophysiology
KW - Sonification
KW - Motor Imagery
KW - Action Observation
KW - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
U2 - 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105768
DO - 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105768
M3 - Article
C2 - 34144438
SN - 0278-2626
VL - 152
SP - 105768
JO - Brain and Cognition
JF - Brain and Cognition
ER -