Taking a strong interactional stance

Frank Förster; Frank Broz; Mark Neerincx

doi:10.1017/S0140525X22001455

Taking a strong interactional stance

Frank Förster, Frank Broz, Mark Neerincx

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

We outline two points of criticism with respect to the target article. Firstly, we argue that robots do constitute a separate category of beings in people's minds rather than being mere depictions of non-robotic characters. Secondly, we find that (semi-)automatic processes underpinning communicative interaction play a greater role in shaping robot-directed speech than Clark and Fischer's theory of social robots as depictions indicate.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	e29
Journal	The Behavioral and brain sciences
Volume	46
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22001455
Publication status	Published - 5 Apr 2023
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

human-robot interaction
HRI

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X22001455

Cite this

@article{a7ecd8fcac274270b7d50591c16ead9f,

title = "Taking a strong interactional stance",

abstract = "We outline two points of criticism with respect to the target article. Firstly, we argue that robots do constitute a separate category of beings in people's minds rather than being mere depictions of non-robotic characters. Secondly, we find that (semi-)automatic processes underpinning communicative interaction play a greater role in shaping robot-directed speech than Clark and Fischer's theory of social robots as depictions indicate.",

keywords = "human-robot interaction, HRI",

author = "Frank F{\"o}rster and Frank Broz and Mark Neerincx",

year = "2023",

month = apr,

day = "5",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X22001455",

language = "English",

volume = "46",

pages = "e29",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking a strong interactional stance

AU - Förster, Frank

AU - Broz, Frank

AU - Neerincx, Mark

PY - 2023/4/5

Y1 - 2023/4/5

N2 - We outline two points of criticism with respect to the target article. Firstly, we argue that robots do constitute a separate category of beings in people's minds rather than being mere depictions of non-robotic characters. Secondly, we find that (semi-)automatic processes underpinning communicative interaction play a greater role in shaping robot-directed speech than Clark and Fischer's theory of social robots as depictions indicate.

AB - We outline two points of criticism with respect to the target article. Firstly, we argue that robots do constitute a separate category of beings in people's minds rather than being mere depictions of non-robotic characters. Secondly, we find that (semi-)automatic processes underpinning communicative interaction play a greater role in shaping robot-directed speech than Clark and Fischer's theory of social robots as depictions indicate.

KW - human-robot interaction

KW - HRI

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151790406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X22001455

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X22001455

M3 - Article

C2 - 37017039

AN - SCOPUS:85151790406

VL - 46

SP - e29

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

ER -

Taking a strong interactional stance

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this