Abstract
The effect of telephone transmission on a listener's ability to recognise a speaker in a voice parade is investigated. A hundred listeners (25 per condition) heard 1 of 5 ‘target' voices, then returned a week later for a voice parade. The 4 conditions were: target exposure and parade both at studio quality; exposure and parade both at telephone quality; studio exposure with telephone parade, and vice versa. Fewer correct identifications followed from telephone exposure and parade (64%) than from studio exposure and parade (76%). Fewer still resulted for studio exposure/telephone parade (60%) and, dramatically, only 32% for telephone exposure/studio parade. Certain speakers were identified more readily than others across all conditions. Confidence ratings reflected this effect of speaker, but not the effect of exposure/parade condition.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 257-272 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Phonetica |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 4 Dec 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Telephone transmission and earwitnesses: performance on voice parades controlled for voice similarity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver