TY - CHAP
T1 - "The Agony of Despair": Pain and the Cultural Script of Infanticide in England and Wales, 1860–1960
AU - Grey, Daniel
N1 - © Daniel J.R. Grey 2014. Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited.
PY - 2014/7/9
Y1 - 2014/7/9
N2 - Pain — both physical and emotional — was central to the cultural script of infanticide in England and Wales between 1860 and 1960. Despite Elaine Scarry’s famous suggestion that ‘Whatever pain achieves, it achieves in part through its unsharability’,1 recent scholarship has emphasised that pain is indeed both ‘shareable’ through visual, textual and oral means, and that it is assigned historically and culturally specific meanings by those who witness and experience it.2 By ‘cultural script’, in this instance, I refer to a commonly accepted set of assumptions about what it meant to be ‘infanticidal’ between the late nineteenth and mid-twentieth centuries, beliefs that were shared by a diverse cohort of English and Welsh men and women. This included, but was not confined to, politicians from across the political spectrum, doctors, lawyers and social scientists. It was generally understood that the ‘typical’ infanticide defendant was a young woman who had been perceived as virtuous and hard-working prior to the crime, was then seduced and abandoned by a feckless or malicious man under false promises of marriage and ‘respectable motherhood’, and was left facing economic and reputational ruin if her condition were discovered. The more closely a woman could ‘fit’ the story of her individual circumstances into this narrative, the more likely it was that a judge and jury would view her sympathetically
AB - Pain — both physical and emotional — was central to the cultural script of infanticide in England and Wales between 1860 and 1960. Despite Elaine Scarry’s famous suggestion that ‘Whatever pain achieves, it achieves in part through its unsharability’,1 recent scholarship has emphasised that pain is indeed both ‘shareable’ through visual, textual and oral means, and that it is assigned historically and culturally specific meanings by those who witness and experience it.2 By ‘cultural script’, in this instance, I refer to a commonly accepted set of assumptions about what it meant to be ‘infanticidal’ between the late nineteenth and mid-twentieth centuries, beliefs that were shared by a diverse cohort of English and Welsh men and women. This included, but was not confined to, politicians from across the political spectrum, doctors, lawyers and social scientists. It was generally understood that the ‘typical’ infanticide defendant was a young woman who had been perceived as virtuous and hard-working prior to the crime, was then seduced and abandoned by a feckless or malicious man under false promises of marriage and ‘respectable motherhood’, and was left facing economic and reputational ruin if her condition were discovered. The more closely a woman could ‘fit’ the story of her individual circumstances into this narrative, the more likely it was that a judge and jury would view her sympathetically
U2 - 10.1057/9781137372437_12
DO - 10.1057/9781137372437_12
M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)
SN - 978-1-349-47613-8
T3 - Palgrave Studies in the History of Emotions
SP - 204
EP - 219
BT - Pain and Emotion in Modern History
A2 - Boddice, Rob
PB - Palgrave Macmillan
ER -