Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effects of graded tasks on physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This review establishes the extent to which the behaviour change technique (BCT) Graded Tasks is effective in increasing physical activity. Databases, including PubMed, Cochrane and PsycINFO, were searched (October 2024) for randomised control trials of Graded Tasks interventions with adult physical activity change as the main outcome. Graded Tasks were always delivered alongside BCTs ‘goal setting (behaviour)’ and ‘action planning’. Of the 53 identified studies (N = 10,060), 39 were included in a random effects meta-analysis, indicating a significant, medium effect of Graded Tasks interventions in increasing physical activity (N = 4190, g = 0.61, CI 95% 0.42–0.81, p <.001, I 2= 83%). Prevention-based interventions (g = 0.78, CI 95% 0.43–1.12, p <.001, I 2= 90%) had larger effects than treatment-based interventions (g = 0.38, CI 95% 0.23–0.53, p <.001, I 2= 34). The number of Graded Task increments explained significant variability in physical activity change (R 2 = 0.47, β = 0.68, p <.001). GRADE certainty of evidence was rated low. Graded Tasks, in conjunction with other BCTs, are effective for increasing physical activity, particularly for prevention. The included studies did, however, show high heterogeneity and potential publication bias. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022347300.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages19
JournalHealth Psychology Review
Early online date5 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Feb 2026

Keywords

  • Graded tasks
  • behaviour change
  • behaviour change techniques
  • goal setting
  • meta-analysis
  • physical activity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of graded tasks on physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this