The Equality Effects of the 'Hyper-formalization' of Selection

Mike Noon, Geraldine Healy, Cynthia Forson, Franklin Oikelome

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)


This paper explores how formalization of employee selection procedures for the purpose of ensuring equality of opportunity can become so extensive that the intended outcome of fairness is undermined. Drawing on empirical evidence from a large media organization, the analysis reveals the detrimental impact of formalization in relation to the recruitment of ethnic minority staff. While the existing literature describes how, during recruitment of employees, the circumvention of formal equality procedures can occur through managerial neglect and manipulation, the analysis in this paper shows that, paradoxically, circumvention can also occur through compliance with procedures. This new category takes three forms (robotic, defensive and malicious) and appears under conditions of excessive formalization – the term hyper-formalization is coined to describe this. The paper develops new concepts that add to understanding of the limitations of equality and diversity procedures, and brings fresh challenges to some of the liberal assumptions about the efficacy and desirability of formalization for achieving fairness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-46
JournalBritish Journal of Management
Issue number3
Early online date30 Jan 2012
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2013


Dive into the research topics of 'The Equality Effects of the 'Hyper-formalization' of Selection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this