Abstract
In this paper I will trace the path of Nagel’s thought, from the reasons that led him to ambivalent embrace of panpsychism, to his present view. Having arrived at his present position I will consider how to make best sense of it. Is it panpsychism, or not? And were the seeds of that view present all along?
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Klēsis |
Volume | 42 |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2018 |