The eyes don't have it: Lie detection and neuro-linguistic programming

Richard Wiseman, Caroline Watt, Leanne ten Brinke, Stephen Porter, Sara-Louise Couper, Calum Rankin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
329 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Proponents of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) claim that certain eye-movements are reliable indicators of lying. According to this notion, a person looking up to their right suggests a lie whereas looking up to their left is indicative of truth telling. Despite widespread belief in this claim, no previous research has examined its validity. In Study 1 the eye movements of participants who were lying or telling the truth were coded, but did not match the NLP patterning. In Study 2 one group of participants were told about the NLP eye-movement hypothesis whilst a second control group were not. Both groups then undertook a lie detection test. No significant differences emerged between the two groups. Study 3 involved coding the eye movements of both liars and truth tellers taking part in high profile press conferences. Once again, no significant differences were discovered. Taken together the results of the three studies fail to support the claims of NLP. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere40259
Number of pages5
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume7
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The eyes don't have it: Lie detection and neuro-linguistic programming'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this