The impact of National Qualifications Frameworks: by which yardstick do we measure dreams?

Nick Pilcher, Scott Fernie, Karen Smith

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)
    73 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    National Qualifications Frameworks (NQFs) are a global phenomenon. This is evidenced by their scale, coverage and intrinsic link with education policy across Europe and beyond. Research into their impact has encompassed a number of perspectives; theoretical, practical and evaluative. Yet, despite the existence of critical literature related to the development, design and impact of NQFs, little research has questioned the actual feasibility of researching the ‘impact’ of NQFs per se. The arguments in this paper position such research as both unfeasible and futile: a dream for which it is impossible to identify a suitable yardstick to measure. We base our argument around three broad themes: linguistics and semantics; homogeneity and; methodological complexity. Around these themes we aim to show why such research has proved problematic and, in doing so, contribute to the field as it explores the impact of NQFs in the future.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-12
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Education and Work
    Volume30
    Issue number1
    Early online date16 Dec 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2017

    Keywords

    • national qualifications framework
    • impact

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of National Qualifications Frameworks: by which yardstick do we measure dreams?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this