The institutional antecedents of the assignment of HRM responsibilities to line managers

Chris Brewster, Michael Brookes, Paul Golan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article uses large-scale international data to examine how much autonomy
organizations have to assign human resource management responsibilities to
line managers, as indicated in the prescriptions of the literature. We use data
from 11 countries to explore the impact of a variety of internal characteristics
of organizations and the kind of economy in which they operate. We fi nd that
around half of the organizations assign HRM responsibilities to the line and that
organizations appear to have considerable latitude in making choices in this area.
Organizations in the Nordic economies are most likely to assign responsibilities
for HRM to the line and those in the liberal market economies are the least
likely to do so. In any economy, larger organizations, unionized organizations,
and those with strategically positioned HRM departments are the least likely to
allocate responsibilities for HRM to the line. We discuss the implications of our
fi ndings for future research and for practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)577-597
Number of pages21
JournalHuman Resource Management
Volume54
Issue number4
Early online date20 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2015

Keywords

  • line manager's role in HRM
  • organizational choice
  • varieties of capitalism
  • HRM identity
  • HRM function

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The institutional antecedents of the assignment of HRM responsibilities to line managers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this