Abstract
I briefly address Duncan Pritchard’s ‘parity argument’ and argue that it should be pared down to parity between religious hinges and local hinges. I then object to Pritchard’s notion of ‘honest doubt’ as ‘religious epistemic vertigo’ to account—in the context of a Wittgensteinian epistemology—for the doubt that is often at the heart of religious belief. I argue that the ‘local’ nature of religious hinges offers a more plausible account.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Religions |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Early online date | 15 Sept 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 15 Sept 2025 |
Keywords
- epistemic vertigo
- relativism
- hinge epistemology
- On Certainty
- religion