The Montgomery judgement and pharmacist consultations

Claudia Carr; Nina  Barnett

doi:10.1002/psb.1639

The Montgomery judgement and pharmacist consultations

Claudia Carr
, Nina Barnett

Schools of Law and Education

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

There is little awareness among pharmacists of the existence of the Montgomery judgment or its potential implications for medicines‐related consultations. Nina Barnett and Claudia Carr therefore undertook a survey of pharmacists in England to create a baseline for current knowledge about informed consent in the context of medicines‐related consultations.

Original language	English
Journal	The Prescriber
Volume	29
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/psb.1639
Publication status	Published - 23 Jan 2018

Access to Document

10.1002/psb.1639

Cite this

@article{3fb79c26538143898a7f27ebd2b0c9e0,

title = "The Montgomery judgement and pharmacist consultations",

abstract = "There is little awareness among pharmacists of the existence of the Montgomery judgment or its potential implications for medicines‐related consultations. Nina Barnett and Claudia Carr therefore undertook a survey of pharmacists in England to create a baseline for current knowledge about informed consent in the context of medicines‐related consultations.",

author = "Claudia Carr and Nina Barnett",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "23",

doi = "10.1002/psb.1639",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

journal = "The Prescriber ",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Montgomery judgement and pharmacist consultations

AU - Carr, Claudia

AU - Barnett, Nina

PY - 2018/1/23

Y1 - 2018/1/23

N2 - There is little awareness among pharmacists of the existence of the Montgomery judgment or its potential implications for medicines‐related consultations. Nina Barnett and Claudia Carr therefore undertook a survey of pharmacists in England to create a baseline for current knowledge about informed consent in the context of medicines‐related consultations.

AB - There is little awareness among pharmacists of the existence of the Montgomery judgment or its potential implications for medicines‐related consultations. Nina Barnett and Claudia Carr therefore undertook a survey of pharmacists in England to create a baseline for current knowledge about informed consent in the context of medicines‐related consultations.

U2 - 10.1002/psb.1639

DO - 10.1002/psb.1639

M3 - Article

VL - 29

JO - The Prescriber

JF - The Prescriber

IS - 1

ER -

The Montgomery judgement and pharmacist consultations

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this