Abstract
Professions are undergoing a significant change in how they integrate environmental and social objectives into their core values. This article examines the situation in which those working in the project management profession are expected to work under contradictory sustainability constraints.
In this article, we investigate the tensions project managers experience when addressing sustainable objectives. Results show that when tensions arise over sustainable objectives (temporality of objectives, organizational barriers, and lack of control), they are addressed only when anchored to an economic one in the form of a business case for sustainability. We also find that when matching traditional project objectives with sustainable ones is not possible, practitioners enact a set of reactions characterized as ‘greenwashing,’, ‘it can’t be one person’, ‘no space for sustainability in my job’, ‘other actors involved’, or ‘pushing back’, depending on the specific project context.
In this article, we investigate the tensions project managers experience when addressing sustainable objectives. Results show that when tensions arise over sustainable objectives (temporality of objectives, organizational barriers, and lack of control), they are addressed only when anchored to an economic one in the form of a business case for sustainability. We also find that when matching traditional project objectives with sustainable ones is not possible, practitioners enact a set of reactions characterized as ‘greenwashing,’, ‘it can’t be one person’, ‘no space for sustainability in my job’, ‘other actors involved’, or ‘pushing back’, depending on the specific project context.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Project Management Journal |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2021 |