Abstract
The reform of urban and environmental planning in England since the election of the Coalition government in 2010 has resulted in the emergence of Neighbourhood Planning: a situation in which citizens can autonomously assemble, define the spatial extent of their neighbourhood and author a plan for it. In this paper, we argue that this radical policy is part of a wider agenda to de-professionalise planning as a statutory function and has its roots in an odd assemblage of classical right-wing political thinking and the prescriptions of post-positivist planning theory. This uneasy conceptual relationship reveals a wider inconsistency between the policy in rhetorical form and its practical implementation. Drawing on primary research from England’s North-West and a thorough review of literature, we hope to show that the dream of citizen-centred planning masks deep tensions within the activity of urban and environmental management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 344-363 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Local Government Studies |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 May 2017 |
Keywords
- citizen participation
- Localism
- Neighbourhood Planning
- post-political theory
- post-positivist planning theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '‘The planners’ dream goes wrong?’ Questioning citizen-centred planning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver