The self-practice of sport psychologists: Do they practice what they preach?

Stephen Pack, Brian Hemmings, Monna Arvinen-Barrow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
178 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The maturation processes of applied sport psychologists have received little research attention despite trainees and practitioners having often reported experiencing challenging circumstances when working with clients. Within clinical psychology literature the self-practice of cognitive techniques, alongside self-reflection, has been advocated as a means of addressing such circumstances, and as a significant source of experiential learning. The present study sought to identify the possible types of, and purposes for, self-practice amongst twelve UK-based sport psychology practitioners. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews indicated all participants engaged in self-practice for reasons such as managing the self, enhancing understanding of intervention, and legitimising intervention. Some participants also described limitations to self-practice. Subsequently, three overriding themes emerged from analysis: a) the professional practise swamp, b) approaches to, and purposes for, self-practice, and, c) limitations of self-practice. It is concluded that self-practice may provide a means of better understanding self-as-person and self-as-practitioner, and the interplay between both, and is recommended as part of on-going practitioner maturation
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-210
Number of pages13
JournalThe Sports Psychologist
Volume28
Issue number2
Early online date23 May 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The self-practice of sport psychologists: Do they practice what they preach?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this