Abstract
The Black Lives Matter movement and coronavirus pandemic have raised awareness of society's categorisation of non-white people and institutional language used. We add to contemporary debate on the BAME acronym (Black, Asian and minority ethnic) by providing a critical examination of the perceptions and attitudes towards it in the UK. Drawing on in-depth interviews with women from these communities who were working in the hyper-masculinised and white-dominated sporting industry, we privilege the voices of those who traditionally have been omitted. Adopting a Critical Race Theory approach and an intersectional lens three overarching themes were identified: rejection and indifference towards the BAME acronym; filling in the form – inadequacies of the system; and, making up the quota – perpetuating (work-related) insecurity(ies). The findings provide analytical insight into institutional language and highlight the potential for the BAME acronym to cause distress and alienation while preserving the concept of Whiteness.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 867-888 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | International Review for the Sociology of Sport (IRSS) |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 3 Nov 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Aug 2023 |
Keywords
- critical race theory
- race
- BAME terminology
- gender
- intersectionality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ticking the right boxes: A critical examination of the perceptions and attitudes towards the black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) acronym in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver