Abstract
This paper explores the impact of the introduction of competition and profit to the probation service in England and Wales following the implementation of the Transforming Rehabilitation reforms. The paper adapts the ideas advanced in Foucault’s Discipline and Punish to draw similarities between the characteristics of ‘disciplinary institutions’ and a micro-physics of (market) power in probation under Transforming Rehabilitation. It utilises Foucault’s ‘instruments’ of disciplinary power – hierarchical observation, normalising judgement, and the examination – as lenses through which to highlight the unintended consequences of the installation of market techniques within the service. The paper argues that the constraints peculiar to instilling decentralising market mechanisms that were presented as a means to liberate practitioners and reduce reoffending have entrenched further the centralising tendencies associated with managerialism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 108-126 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Punishment and Society |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 28 May 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2020 |
Keywords
- Foucault
- Transforming Rehabilitation
- managerialism
- marketisation
- probation