Twelve empty seats : reflections on judge only trials after jury tampering

Nicola Haralambous; C. Monaghan

Twelve empty seats : reflections on judge only trials after jury tampering

Nicola Haralambous, C. Monaghan

Schools of Law and Education

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

For the first time in legal history the Central Criminal Court is sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice in a judge alone trial. R. v T; R. v B; R. v C; R. v H (“R. v T”)1 has proved to be highly controversial. The trial, taking place in Court 35, has attracted the attention of practitioners, academics, the media and subsequently, the general public. It is no exaggeration to say
that this landmark decision will have a lasting impact on the nature of the adversarial criminal trial.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	10-11
Journal	Criminal Bar Quarterly
Issue number	1
Publication status	Published - 2010

Access to Document

http://www.criminalbar.com/

Cite this

@article{e2cf558ee78f4414b1cf1b1d03e42f5e,

title = "Twelve empty seats : reflections on judge only trials after jury tampering",

abstract = "For the first time in legal history the Central Criminal Court is sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice in a judge alone trial. R. v T; R. v B; R. v C; R. v H (“R. v T”)1 has proved to be highly controversial. The trial, taking place in Court 35, has attracted the attention of practitioners, academics, the media and subsequently, the general public. It is no exaggeration to say that this landmark decision will have a lasting impact on the nature of the adversarial criminal trial.",

author = "Nicola Haralambous and C. Monaghan",

note = "Original article can be found at : http://www.criminalbar.com/ Copyright Criminal Bar Association [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]",

year = "2010",

language = "English",

pages = "10--11",

journal = "Criminal Bar Quarterly",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Twelve empty seats : reflections on judge only trials after jury tampering

AU - Haralambous, Nicola

AU - Monaghan, C.

N1 - Original article can be found at : http://www.criminalbar.com/ Copyright Criminal Bar Association [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - For the first time in legal history the Central Criminal Court is sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice in a judge alone trial. R. v T; R. v B; R. v C; R. v H (“R. v T”)1 has proved to be highly controversial. The trial, taking place in Court 35, has attracted the attention of practitioners, academics, the media and subsequently, the general public. It is no exaggeration to say that this landmark decision will have a lasting impact on the nature of the adversarial criminal trial.

AB - For the first time in legal history the Central Criminal Court is sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice in a judge alone trial. R. v T; R. v B; R. v C; R. v H (“R. v T”)1 has proved to be highly controversial. The trial, taking place in Court 35, has attracted the attention of practitioners, academics, the media and subsequently, the general public. It is no exaggeration to say that this landmark decision will have a lasting impact on the nature of the adversarial criminal trial.

M3 - Article

SP - 10

EP - 11

JO - Criminal Bar Quarterly

JF - Criminal Bar Quarterly

IS - 1

ER -

Twelve empty seats : reflections on judge only trials after jury tampering

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this