Ungulates rely less on visual cues, but more on adapting movement behaviour, when searching for forage

Jan A. Venter, Herbert H T Prins, Alla Mashanova, Rob Slotow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Finding suitable forage patches in a heterogeneous landscape, where patches change dynamically both spatially and temporally could be challenging to large herbivores, especially if they have no a priori knowledge of the location of the patches. We tested whether three large grazing herbivores with a variety of different traits improve their efficiency when foraging at a heterogeneous habitat patch scale by using visual cues to gain a priori knowledge about potential higher value foraging patches. For each species (zebra (Equus burchelli), red hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus subspecies camaa) and eland (Tragelaphus oryx)), we used step lengths and directionality of movement to infer whether they were using visual cues to find suitable forage patches at a habitat patch scale. Step lengths were significantly longer for all species when moving to nonvisible patches than to visible patches, but all movements showed little directionality. Of the three species, zebra movements were the most directional. Red hartebeest had the shortest step lengths and zebra the longest. We conclude that these large grazing herbivores may not exclusively use visual cues when foraging at a habitat patch scale, but would rather adapt their movement behaviour, mainly step length, to the heterogeneity of the specific landscape.
Original languageEnglish
Article number3178
Number of pages15
JournalPeerJ
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 May 2017

Keywords

  • ungulate
  • foraging
  • pondoland
  • Mkambati Nature Reserve
  • Eland
  • Zebra
  • Hartebeest
  • Movement behavior

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ungulates rely less on visual cues, but more on adapting movement behaviour, when searching for forage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this