TY - JOUR
T1 - Uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes in England
T2 - A realist review protocol
AU - Musa, Massirfufulay
AU - Akdur, Gizdem
AU - Hanratty , Barbara
AU - Kelly, Sarah
AU - Gordon, Adam
AU - Peryer, Guy
AU - Spilsbury, Karen
AU - Killett, Anne
AU - Burton, Jennifer
AU - Meyer, Julienne
AU - Fortescue, Sue
AU - Towers, Ann-Marie
AU - Irvine, Lisa
AU - Goodman, Claire
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
PY - 2020/11/14
Y1 - 2020/11/14
N2 - Introduction Care homes provide nursing and social care for older people who can no longer live independently at home. In the UK, there is no consistent approach to how information about residents' medical history, care needs and preferences are collected and shared. This limits opportunities to understand the care home population, have a systematic approach to assessment and documentation of care, identifiy care home residents at risk of deterioration and review care. Countries with standardised approaches to residents' assessment, care planning and review (eg, minimum data sets (MDS)) use the data to understand the care home population, guide resource allocation, monitor services delivery and for research. The aim of this realist review is to develop a theory-driven understanding of how care home staff implement and use MDS to plan and deliver care of individual residents. Methods and analysis A realist review will be conducted in three research stages. Stage 1 will scope the literature and develop candidate programme theories of what ensures effective uptake and sustained implementation of an MDS. Stage2 will test and refine these theories through further iterative searches of the evidence from the literature to establish how effective uptake of an MDS can be achieved. Stage 3 will consult with relevant stakeholders to test or refine the programme theory (theories) of how an MDS works at the resident level of care for different stakeholders and in what circumstances. Data synthesis will use realist logic to align data from each eligible article with possible context-mechanism-outcome configurations or specific elements that answer the research questions. Ethics and dissemination The University of Hertfordshire Ethics Committee has approved this study (HSK/SF/UH/04169). Findings will be disseminated through briefings with stakeholders, conference presentations, a national consultation on the use of an MDS in UK long-term care settings, publications in peer-reviewed journals and in print and social media publications accessible to residents, relatives and care home staff. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020171323; this review protocol is registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.
AB - Introduction Care homes provide nursing and social care for older people who can no longer live independently at home. In the UK, there is no consistent approach to how information about residents' medical history, care needs and preferences are collected and shared. This limits opportunities to understand the care home population, have a systematic approach to assessment and documentation of care, identifiy care home residents at risk of deterioration and review care. Countries with standardised approaches to residents' assessment, care planning and review (eg, minimum data sets (MDS)) use the data to understand the care home population, guide resource allocation, monitor services delivery and for research. The aim of this realist review is to develop a theory-driven understanding of how care home staff implement and use MDS to plan and deliver care of individual residents. Methods and analysis A realist review will be conducted in three research stages. Stage 1 will scope the literature and develop candidate programme theories of what ensures effective uptake and sustained implementation of an MDS. Stage2 will test and refine these theories through further iterative searches of the evidence from the literature to establish how effective uptake of an MDS can be achieved. Stage 3 will consult with relevant stakeholders to test or refine the programme theory (theories) of how an MDS works at the resident level of care for different stakeholders and in what circumstances. Data synthesis will use realist logic to align data from each eligible article with possible context-mechanism-outcome configurations or specific elements that answer the research questions. Ethics and dissemination The University of Hertfordshire Ethics Committee has approved this study (HSK/SF/UH/04169). Findings will be disseminated through briefings with stakeholders, conference presentations, a national consultation on the use of an MDS in UK long-term care settings, publications in peer-reviewed journals and in print and social media publications accessible to residents, relatives and care home staff. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020171323; this review protocol is registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.
KW - epidemiology
KW - geriatric medicine
KW - health services administration & management
KW - palliative care
KW - public health
KW - quality in health care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096268610&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040397
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040397
M3 - Article
C2 - 33191266
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 10
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 11
M1 - e040397
ER -