Use of bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a meta-analysis of patients with coronary artery disease

Mohamed Farag, Nikolaos Spinthakis, Diana A Gorog, Abhiram Prasad, Keith Sullivan, Zaki Akhtar, Neville Kukreja, Manivannan Srinivasan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)


BACKGROUND: Differences in outcomes between bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) systems and drug-eluting metal stents (DES) have not been fully evaluated. We aimed to compare clinical and angiographic outcomes in randomised studies of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), with a secondary analysis performed among registry studies.

METHODS: A meta-analysis comparing outcomes between BVS and DES in patients with CAD. Overall estimates of treatment effect were calculated with random-effects model and fixed-effects model.

RESULTS: In 6 randomised trials (3818 patients), BVS increased the risk of subacute stent thrombosis (ST) over and above DES (OR 2.14; CI 1.01 to 4.53; p=0.05), with a trend towards an increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) (125 events in those assigned to BVS and 50 to DES; OR 1.36; CI 0.97 to 1.91; p=0.07). The risk of in-device late lumen loss (LLL) was higher with BVS than DES (mean difference 0.08 mm; CI 0.03 to 0.13; p=0.004). There was no difference in the risk of death or target vessel revascularisation (TVR) between the two devices. In 6 registry studies (1845 patients), there was no difference in the risk of death, MI, TVR or subacute ST between the two stents. Final BVS dilation pressures were higher in registry than in randomised studies (18.7±4.6 vs 15.2±3.3 atm; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with BVS had an increased risk of subacute ST and slightly higher LLL compared with those with DES, but this might be related to inadequate implantation techniques, in particular device underexpansion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e000462
JournalOpen Heart
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 26 Aug 2016


  • Journal Article


Dive into the research topics of 'Use of bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a meta-analysis of patients with coronary artery disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this