TY - JOUR
T1 - Utility of Phase Angle to Identify Cachexia and Assess Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease
AU - Seres, David
AU - Mckeaveney, Clare
AU - Adamson, Gary
AU - Davenport, Andrew
AU - Farrington, Ken
AU - Fouque, Denis
AU - Kalanter-Zadeh, Kamyar
AU - Mallett, John
AU - Maxwell, Peter
AU - Mullan, Robert
AU - Nobel, Helen
AU - O’Donoghue, Donal
AU - Porter, Sam
AU - Shields, Joanne
AU - Slee, Adrian
AU - Witham, Miles
AU - Reid, Joanne
N1 - © 2020 American Society for Nutrition. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an Open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
PY - 2023/2/10
Y1 - 2023/2/10
N2 - Objectives
This cross-sectional analysis sought to identify cachexia and assess survival using phase angle (PA) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving haemodialysis.
Methods
Patients receiving haemodialysis (n = 87, mean age 65.9 +/– 13.0) completed a Phase Angle (PA; 50 khz) measurement using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Cachexia variables were recorded according to Evans et al. definition (2008) including nutritional and functional measures (weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), Hand Grip Strength (HGS), Lean Tissue Mass (LTM), C-Reative Protein (CRP), serum albumin, haemoglobin, appetite (Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Treatment (FAACT)) and fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)). Survival was assessed at 12 months. Mann Whitney-U and Spearman correlation coefficient were conducted.
Results
The majority of patients completed follow up (n = 76). Eleven patients had died. Mean PA was not statistically different between those identified as cachectic and non-cachectic according to Evans et al. (2008) definition or between those patients that survived and died. However, patients that survived had better mean scores of weight, BMI, HGS, CRP, serum albumin and fatigue (FACIT). In addition, LTM scores were significantly better in patients that survived (P < .01). Appetite scores were also significantly better in patients that survived (P < .01) and those without cachexia (P = .01).
Conclusions
This study was part of a larger effort to clarity a phenotype of cachexia in ESRD. Unlike previous research, this study did not find PA useful in identifying patients at a higher risk of cachexia or death. However overall these patients had a very low mean PA. FAACT did discriminate between groups indicating self-reporting measurement tools of nutritional status were useful in identifying patients at a higher risk of cachexia and death. A larger sample and longer follow up is required to balance the limitations of this small study. Timing the administration of PA also requires consideration in future studies.
Funding Sources
Public Health Agency; Northern Ireland Kidney Research Fund.
AB - Objectives
This cross-sectional analysis sought to identify cachexia and assess survival using phase angle (PA) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving haemodialysis.
Methods
Patients receiving haemodialysis (n = 87, mean age 65.9 +/– 13.0) completed a Phase Angle (PA; 50 khz) measurement using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Cachexia variables were recorded according to Evans et al. definition (2008) including nutritional and functional measures (weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), Hand Grip Strength (HGS), Lean Tissue Mass (LTM), C-Reative Protein (CRP), serum albumin, haemoglobin, appetite (Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Treatment (FAACT)) and fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)). Survival was assessed at 12 months. Mann Whitney-U and Spearman correlation coefficient were conducted.
Results
The majority of patients completed follow up (n = 76). Eleven patients had died. Mean PA was not statistically different between those identified as cachectic and non-cachectic according to Evans et al. (2008) definition or between those patients that survived and died. However, patients that survived had better mean scores of weight, BMI, HGS, CRP, serum albumin and fatigue (FACIT). In addition, LTM scores were significantly better in patients that survived (P < .01). Appetite scores were also significantly better in patients that survived (P < .01) and those without cachexia (P = .01).
Conclusions
This study was part of a larger effort to clarity a phenotype of cachexia in ESRD. Unlike previous research, this study did not find PA useful in identifying patients at a higher risk of cachexia or death. However overall these patients had a very low mean PA. FAACT did discriminate between groups indicating self-reporting measurement tools of nutritional status were useful in identifying patients at a higher risk of cachexia and death. A larger sample and longer follow up is required to balance the limitations of this small study. Timing the administration of PA also requires consideration in future studies.
Funding Sources
Public Health Agency; Northern Ireland Kidney Research Fund.
U2 - 10.1093/cdn/nzaa055_029
DO - 10.1093/cdn/nzaa055_029
M3 - Article
SN - 2475-2991
VL - 4
SP - 1144
JO - Current Developments in Nutrition
JF - Current Developments in Nutrition
IS - Supplement 2
M1 - nzaa055_029
ER -