Web 2.0 vs. the Semantic Web: A Philosophical Assessment

L. Floridi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)
94 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The paper develops some of the conclusions, reached in Floridi (2007), concerning the future developments of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and their impact on our lives. The two main theses supported in that article were that, as the information society develops, the threshold between online and offline is becoming increasingly blurred, and that, once there won’t be any significant difference, we shall gradually re-conceptualise ourselves not as cyborgs but rather as inforgs, i.e. socially connected, informational organisms. In this paper, I look at the development of the so-called Semantic Web and Web 2.0 from this perspective and try to forecast their future. Regarding the Semantic Web, I argue that it is a clear and well-defined project, which, despite some authoritative views to the contrary, is not a promising reality and will probably fail in the same way AI has failed in the past. Regarding Web 2.0, I argue that, although it is a rather ill-defined project, which lacks a clear explanation of its nature and scope, it does have the potentiality of becoming a success (and indeed it is already, as part of the new phenomenon of Cloud Computing) because it leverages the only semantic engines available so far in nature, us. I conclude by suggesting what other changes might be expected in the future of our digital environment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-27
JournalEpisteme
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • cloud computing
  • inforgs
  • infosphere

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Web 2.0 vs. the Semantic Web: A Philosophical Assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this