What is a Firm? A Reply to Jean-Philippe Robé

Simon Deakin, David Gindis, Geoffrey Hodgson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In his recent book on 'Property, Power and Politics', Jean-Philippe Robé makes a strong case for the need to understand the legal foundations of modern capitalism. He also insists that it is important to distinguish between firms and corporations. We agree. But Robé criticizes our definition of firms in terms of legally recognized capacities on the grounds that it does not take the distinction seriously enough. He argues that firms are not legally recognized as such, as the law only knows corporations. This argument, which is capable of different interpretations, leads to the bizarre result that corporations are not firms. Using etymological and other evidence, we show that firms are treated as legally constituted business entities in both common parlance and legal discourse. The way the law defines firms and corporations, while the product of a discourse which is in many ways distinct from everyday language, has such profound implications for the way firms operate in practice that no institutional theory of the firm worthy of the name can afford to ignore it.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)861-871
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Institutional Economics
Volume17
Issue number5
Early online date3 Jun 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Oct 2021

Keywords

  • Business corporations
  • firms
  • legal institutionalism
  • legal personality
  • theory of the firm

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What is a Firm? A Reply to Jean-Philippe Robé'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this