'Who's really wicked and immoral, women or men?' Uneasy classifications, Hindu gender roles and infanticide in late nineteenth-century India: Uneasy classifications, Hindu gender roles and infanticide in late nineteenth-century India

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

This chapter explores the different ways in which colonial commentators negotiated the uneasy and permeable boundaries between infanticide cases in late nineteenth-century India where the sex of a newborn was understood to have been a motivating factor in commission of the crime, as well as in those where it was deemed irrelevant. In 1882, a woman from Buldhana in the Central Provinces published a biting denunciation in Marathi of contemporary attitudes towards women in India, entitled A Comparison between Women and Men. The Female Infanticide Act of 1870 passed by the Government of India was a measure that had, to a greater or lesser extent, been constantly agitated for by colonial critics since the late eighteenth century. For the 1870 Act to be passed and implemented, the colonial authorities had to feel secure enough in their hold over north-west India and its surrounding regions to risk stirring up overt opposition to British rule.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTransnational Penal Cultures:
Subtitle of host publicationNew perspectives on discipline, punishment and desistance
EditorsVivien Miller, James Campbell
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter2
Pages36-50
Number of pages15
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781315815312
Publication statusPublished - 30 Oct 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''Who's really wicked and immoral, women or men?' Uneasy classifications, Hindu gender roles and infanticide in late nineteenth-century India: Uneasy classifications, Hindu gender roles and infanticide in late nineteenth-century India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this