Wittgenstein and Leavis: Literature and the Enactment of the Ethical

Daniele Moyal-Sharrock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
133 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For Wittgenstein, ethics cannot be put into words. This does not mean he thought ethics cannot be made manifest; indeed, he took the best manifestation of ethics to occur in aesthetics, and more specifically in literature. Wittgenstein takes us some way toward fleshing out literature’s “perspicuous presentations,” but not far enough. To do this, I appeal to F. R. Leavis’s notion of enactment and his view of the autonomous, active role of language in literature. I conclude that for both, the meaning of literature’s ethical enactments is determined not subjectively but intersubjectively. Literature imposes, and not merely proposes, ethical meaning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)240-264
JournalPhilosophy and Literature
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

Keywords

  • Wittgenstein
  • Leavis
  • enactment
  • literature
  • ethics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wittgenstein and Leavis: Literature and the Enactment of the Ethical'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this