University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

Agreeing on generalised Darwinism: A response to Pavel Pelikan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Agreeing on generalised Darwinism : A response to Pavel Pelikan. / Hodgson, G.M.; Knudsen, T.

In: Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2012, p. 9-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Hodgson, G.M. ; Knudsen, T. / Agreeing on generalised Darwinism : A response to Pavel Pelikan. In: Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2012 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 9-18.

Bibtex

@article{82624b446ec6463e855f80cb710627df,
title = "Agreeing on generalised Darwinism: A response to Pavel Pelikan",
abstract = "Pelikan (J Evol Econ 21:341-366, 2011) develops an interesting conceptual framework that adds to prior work on generalised Darwinism. Despite claims to the contrary we show that it is similar to the approach developed by Hodgson and Knudsen (J Evol Econ 16(4):343-366, 2006a, J Econ Behav Organ 75(1):12-24, 2010a, b), Aldrich et al. (J Evol Econ 18(5):577-596, 2008) and others. Pelikan also mischaracterises the Hodgson-Knudsen position over Lamarckism. We show why the term is misleading (rather than strictly wrong) when applied to social evolution. {\textcopyright} 2011 Springer-Verlag.",
author = "G.M. Hodgson and T. Knudsen",
note = "Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/s00191-011-0249-x",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "9--18",
journal = "Journal of Evolutionary Economics",
issn = "0936-9937",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agreeing on generalised Darwinism

T2 - A response to Pavel Pelikan

AU - Hodgson, G.M.

AU - Knudsen, T.

N1 - Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Pelikan (J Evol Econ 21:341-366, 2011) develops an interesting conceptual framework that adds to prior work on generalised Darwinism. Despite claims to the contrary we show that it is similar to the approach developed by Hodgson and Knudsen (J Evol Econ 16(4):343-366, 2006a, J Econ Behav Organ 75(1):12-24, 2010a, b), Aldrich et al. (J Evol Econ 18(5):577-596, 2008) and others. Pelikan also mischaracterises the Hodgson-Knudsen position over Lamarckism. We show why the term is misleading (rather than strictly wrong) when applied to social evolution. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

AB - Pelikan (J Evol Econ 21:341-366, 2011) develops an interesting conceptual framework that adds to prior work on generalised Darwinism. Despite claims to the contrary we show that it is similar to the approach developed by Hodgson and Knudsen (J Evol Econ 16(4):343-366, 2006a, J Econ Behav Organ 75(1):12-24, 2010a, b), Aldrich et al. (J Evol Econ 18(5):577-596, 2008) and others. Pelikan also mischaracterises the Hodgson-Knudsen position over Lamarckism. We show why the term is misleading (rather than strictly wrong) when applied to social evolution. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855344314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00191-011-0249-x

DO - 10.1007/s00191-011-0249-x

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 9

EP - 18

JO - Journal of Evolutionary Economics

JF - Journal of Evolutionary Economics

SN - 0936-9937

IS - 1

ER -