University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

An Evental Pandemic: Thinking the COVID-19 ‘Event’ with Deleuze and Foucault

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

An Evental Pandemic : Thinking the COVID-19 ‘Event’ with Deleuze and Foucault. / Richter, Hannah; Repo, Jemima.

In: Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 13.07.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{259e57e7b6d64a0fb37ced3f8f76f9f9,
title = "An Evental Pandemic: Thinking the COVID-19 {\textquoteleft}Event{\textquoteright} with Deleuze and Foucault",
abstract = "As COVID-19 swept the world it also became the subject of a quickly growing body of theoretical scholarship aimed at understanding the social, political and economic implications of the {\textquoteleft}pandemic event{\textquoteright}. Taking a step back, this paper draws on Deleuze and Foucault to interrogate whether, and in what way, the COVID-19 pandemic can and should in fact be understood as an event. We first offer a structured overview of existing {\textquoteleft}pandemic theory{\textquoteright} where we highlight that the productivity unfolded by the pandemic event is here either politically or ontologically fixed. Against this background, we show that, in distinct ways, Deleuze{\textquoteright}s and Foucault{\textquoteright}s concepts of the event caution against reifying a pandemic event. Any political force the pandemic can unfold is always made after the fact, and is contingent on what is (counter-)effectuated from the pandemic, or which discursive dispersions intersect with and unfold from it. The pandemic is evental rather than event – it is made up of events, and holds the potential to produce events. For critical theory, the significance of the pandemic event is thus in the first place methodological: it gives insight to how (post-)pandemic societies are produced, and where openings for the actualisation of alternatives might lie.",
author = "Hannah Richter and Jemima Repo",
year = "2022",
month = jul,
day = "13",
language = "English",
journal = "Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Evental Pandemic

T2 - Thinking the COVID-19 ‘Event’ with Deleuze and Foucault

AU - Richter, Hannah

AU - Repo, Jemima

PY - 2022/7/13

Y1 - 2022/7/13

N2 - As COVID-19 swept the world it also became the subject of a quickly growing body of theoretical scholarship aimed at understanding the social, political and economic implications of the ‘pandemic event’. Taking a step back, this paper draws on Deleuze and Foucault to interrogate whether, and in what way, the COVID-19 pandemic can and should in fact be understood as an event. We first offer a structured overview of existing ‘pandemic theory’ where we highlight that the productivity unfolded by the pandemic event is here either politically or ontologically fixed. Against this background, we show that, in distinct ways, Deleuze’s and Foucault’s concepts of the event caution against reifying a pandemic event. Any political force the pandemic can unfold is always made after the fact, and is contingent on what is (counter-)effectuated from the pandemic, or which discursive dispersions intersect with and unfold from it. The pandemic is evental rather than event – it is made up of events, and holds the potential to produce events. For critical theory, the significance of the pandemic event is thus in the first place methodological: it gives insight to how (post-)pandemic societies are produced, and where openings for the actualisation of alternatives might lie.

AB - As COVID-19 swept the world it also became the subject of a quickly growing body of theoretical scholarship aimed at understanding the social, political and economic implications of the ‘pandemic event’. Taking a step back, this paper draws on Deleuze and Foucault to interrogate whether, and in what way, the COVID-19 pandemic can and should in fact be understood as an event. We first offer a structured overview of existing ‘pandemic theory’ where we highlight that the productivity unfolded by the pandemic event is here either politically or ontologically fixed. Against this background, we show that, in distinct ways, Deleuze’s and Foucault’s concepts of the event caution against reifying a pandemic event. Any political force the pandemic can unfold is always made after the fact, and is contingent on what is (counter-)effectuated from the pandemic, or which discursive dispersions intersect with and unfold from it. The pandemic is evental rather than event – it is made up of events, and holds the potential to produce events. For critical theory, the significance of the pandemic event is thus in the first place methodological: it gives insight to how (post-)pandemic societies are produced, and where openings for the actualisation of alternatives might lie.

M3 - Article

JO - Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory

JF - Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory

ER -