University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

From the same journal

By the same authors

An orientation bias in observations of submillimetre galaxies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Article numberstac2008
Number of pages12
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2022


Recent high-resolution interferometric images of submillimetre galaxies (SMGs) reveal fascinatingly complex morphologies. This raises a number of questions: how does the relative orientation of a galaxy affect its observed submillimetre emission, and does this result in an `orientation bias' in the selection and analysis of such galaxies in flux-limited cosmological surveys? We investigate these questions using the Simba cosmological simulation paired with the dust radiative transfer code Powderday. We select eight simulated SMGs ($S_{850}\gtrsim2$ mJy) at $z = 2$, and measure the variance of their `observed' emission over 50 random orientations. Each galaxy exhibits significant scatter in its emission close to the peak of the thermal dust emission, with variation in flux density of up to $\sim$50 mJy at the peak. This results in an appreciable dispersion in the inferred dust temperatures and infrared luminosities ($16^{\mathrm{th}}-84^{\mathrm{th}}$ percentile ranges of 5 K and 0.1 dex, respectively) and therefore a fundamental uncertainty in derived parameters such as dust mass and star formation rate ($\sim$30% for the latter using simple calibrations). Using a Monte Carlo simulation we also assess the impact of orientation on flux-limited surveys, finding a bias in the selection of SMGs towards those with face-on orientations, as well as those at lower redshifts. We predict that the orientation bias will affect flux-limited single-dish surveys, most significantly at THz frequencies, and this bias should be taken into account when placing the results of targeted follow-up studies in a statistical context.


© 2022 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at

ID: 25661971