University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

Analysis of UK and European NOx and VOC emission scenarios in the Defra model intercomparison exercise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


  • Richard Derwent
  • Sean Beevers
  • C. Chemel
  • Sally Cooke
  • Xavier Vazhappilly Francis
  • Andrea Fraser
  • Mathew R. Heal
  • Nutthida Kitwiroon
  • Justin Lingard
  • Alison Redington
  • Ranjeet Sokhi
  • Massimo Vieno
View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-257
JournalAtmospheric Environment
Early online date13 May 2014
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2014


Simple emission scenarios have been implemented in eight United Kingdom air quality models with the aim of assessing how these models compared when addressing whether photochemical ozone formation in southern England was NOx- or VOC-sensitive and whether ozone precursor sources in the UK or in the Rest of Europe (RoE) were the most important during July 2006. The suite of models included three Eulerian-grid models (three implementations of one of these models), a Lagrangian atmospheric dispersion model and two moving box air parcel models. The assignments as to NOx- or VOC-sensitive and to UK- versus RoE-dominant, turned out to be highly variable and often contradictory between the individual models. However, when the assignments were filtered by model performance on each day, many of the contradictions could be eliminated. Nevertheless, no one model was found to be the 'best' model on all days, indicating that no single air quality model could currently be relied upon to inform policymakers robustly in terms of NOx- versus VOC-sensitivity and UK- versus RoE-dominance on each day. It is important to maintain a diversity in model approaches.


This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain

ID: 7067853